top of page

Home > Publications > "AI and Diplomacy: A New Era of International Relations"

April 8th 2025

AI and Diplomacy: A New Era of International Relations

Mihaliková pfp.jpg

By Sofia Mihaliková

Master’s degree student in Political Science at Trnava University, with a Bachelor's degree in International Relations and Diplomacy. Research interests include politics, security, AI governance, and the intersection of technology and public policy. Gained experience through both domestic and international internships, including a research role at Vienna University, as well as positions at the Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency (SARIO) and Europe Direct, focusing on policy analysis and international cooperation. Find Sofia Mihaliková on LinkedIn.

Image by Markus Spiske

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into various sectors, including diplomacy, where it has the potential to significantly transform the way international relations are conducted. AI assists diplomats in analyzing vast amounts of geopolitical data, predicting outcomes, and making informed decisions. As AI technology advances, it raises both opportunities and challenges in how it can reshape diplomatic practices, communication, and decision-making on a global scale.


AI in Diplomacy


One of the major areas where AI is currently being used is data analysis and decision-making. Diplomats are increasingly relying on AI-driven systems to process vast amounts of geopolitical data, which would be impossible to analyze manually. AI models can assess historical data and predict potential outcomes of various diplomatic strategies, allowing diplomats to plan complex scenarios and make informed decisions. These tools are particularly useful when anticipating future events or understanding the long-term consequences of certain diplomatic moves. Additionally, digital diplomacy is another sphere in which AI plays a key role. With the rise of
social media platforms and digital communication channels, AI is being used to analyze public sentiment and track geopolitical trends. For example, AI systems can monitor social media for public opinion on various international issues, offering diplomats real-time insights into how their decisions may be received by foreign populations or what trends are emerging in specific regions.


Furthermore, AI is being employed to improve communication in international relations. Tools like machine translation, enabled by AI algorithms, help diplomats communicate seamlessly across language barriers, ensuring more efficient negotiations and faster dissemination of critical information. In addition, AI models can automate consular functions, such as processing visa applications, thereby enhancing efficiency and reducing the administrative burden on embassies.


Finally, cyber diplomacy has emerged as a crucial area of focus where AI tools are being integrated. Given the growing importance of cybersecurity in international relations, AI is being used to predict and prevent cyberattacks, analyze digital threats, and secure diplomatic communications. The development of AI models that can recognize and neutralize cyber threats in real time is helping states protect their sensitive diplomatic exchanges from potential digital breaches (Yıldırım, 2025).


Advantages of AI in Diplomacy


One of the key advantages of utilizing AI in diplomacy is increased efficiency in decision- making and communication. Diplomats can now leverage AI tools that enable them to quickly analyze large volumes of data and make informed decisions. These technologies allow for the prediction of potential geopolitical events, the evaluation of historical data, and provide recommendations based on the modeling of possible scenarios. This leads to more timely and precise diplomatic actions, allowing diplomats to anticipate international issues and respond with greater agility.


Moreover, AI can significantly improve communication across borders. By breaking down language barriers and enabling real-time translation, AI ensures smoother interactions between countries, making diplomatic exchanges more efficient and accurate. This is especially valuable in the context of global diplomacy, where immediate and clear communication is essential for collaboration.


Furthermore, AI offers tools for enhancing transparency, accountability, and ethical standards. Through the use of AI, diplomats can push for the establishment of international norms that guide the ethical development and application of AI technologies. The creation of regulations surrounding AI deployment helps ensure that nations adopt human-centered principles and that AI systems respect human rights, fairness, and transparency, reducing risks associated with misuse (Meridian, 2025).


Challenges of AI in Diplomacy


Despite its numerous advantages, the integration of AI into diplomatic processes also presents several challenges. One of the major concerns is the security risks associated with AI technologies, particularly in the context of military applications and cyber warfare. There is an ongoing global conversation about the potential use of autonomous AI weapons and surveillance tools, which raises ethical dilemmas and security concerns. The spread of AI-powered weapons, such as unmanned drones, poses risks for international peace and stability, necessitating strong diplomatic efforts to regulate and control their development.


Another challenge is the fragmentation of global regulations. Different countries have varying approaches to AI governance, with some prioritizing innovation and others focusing on consumer protection and safety. For instance, while the EU has adopted precautionary measures to protect consumers from AI-related risks, the U.S. emphasizes fostering innovation with fewer regulatory restrictions. This difference in approaches could lead to regulatory fragmentation, hindering international cooperation and trade. AI diplomacy must navigate these differences and strive to create a set of overarching global guidelines that balance innovation and safety.


Additionally, public concern about AI’s impact on jobs and social inequality is another challenge that diplomats must address. As AI continues to evolve, there is growing fear that automation could lead to job displacement and exacerbate social disparities. Diplomats will need to find ways to alleviate these concerns while ensuring that AI remains a tool for social good and economic development (Meridian, 2025).


The Future of AI in Diplomacy


The future of AI in diplomacy presents three main possibilities. The first involves AI-powered chatbots running for office, already tested in places like Russia and New Zealand. While they can analyze data and respond quickly, their inability to handle human qualities like empathy and moral judgment makes them unsuitable as full replacements for politicians, at least for now.

 

The second scenario is AI-powered direct democracy, where AI agents represent citizens’ preferences and negotiate policy. This idea aims to eliminate traditional politicians, but it raises concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of AI developers, potentially replacing one form of representation with another.
 

The most extreme vision is "algocracy," where AI governs entirely. While this sounds far-fetched, it forces us to reconsider the value of human participation in politics, especially in areas like autonomy and deliberation. Ultimately, AI’s role in politics should enhance human decision-making rather than replace it. Tools like the Habermas Machine, which helps groups reach consensus, show that AI can improve democratic processes without undermining them. The future of AI in politics will likely involve careful integration, amplifying human judgment while preserving democratic integrity (Lechterman, 2025).


Conclusion


Looking ahead, AI’s role in diplomacy presents a variety of possibilities, from AI-powered chatbots running for office to AI-driven direct democracy or even the more extreme vision of "algocracy." While these concepts may seem far-fetched, they prompt a deeper reflection on the value of human involvement in political decision-making. Ultimately, the future of AI in diplomacy should focus on complementing human judgment and improving democratic processes, rather than replacing human decision-makers. As AI continues to evolve, it is crucial to strike a balance that preserves democratic integrity while leveraging technology to enhance diplomacy and international cooperation.

References


Lechterman, T. (2025, January 13). Could AI replace politicians? A philosopher maps out three possible futures. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/could-ai-replace-politicians-a-philosopher-maps-out-three-possible-futures-246901
 

Meridian. (2025). Explainer: Understanding AI Diplomacy. Meridian. Retrieved from: https://meridian.org/news/explainer-understanding-ai-diplomacy/
 

Yıldırım, K. (2025, February 14). AI in diplomacy: How technology is transforming international relations. Diplomatist. Retrieved from: https://diplomatist.com/2025/02/14/ai-in-diplomacy-how-technology-is-transforming-international-relations

Mihaliková pfp.jpg

By Sofia Mihaliková

Master’s degree student in Political Science at Trnava University, with a Bachelor's degree in International Relations and Diplomacy. Research interests include politics, security, AI governance, and the intersection of technology and public policy. Gained experience through both domestic and international internships, including a research role at Vienna University, as well as positions at the Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency (SARIO) and Europe Direct, focusing on policy analysis and international cooperation. Find Sofia Mihaliková on LinkedIn.

Disclaimer: The International Journal for Crime, Law, and AI is committed to fostering academic freedom and open discourse. The views and opinions expressed in published articles are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal, its editorial team, or its affiliates. We encourage diverse perspectives and critical discussions while upholding academic integrity and respect for all viewpoints.

bottom of page